Of the documents needed for getting a passport made under Tatkal Scheme in India, there is one called ‘verification certificate’. It is referred to as Annexure F. Rightly named so. You will soon see why.
For the uninitiated, this is a document that is needed compulsorily, and can only be signed by the bureaucratic elites of the system, who, I am sure fart glitter and poop rainbows. Or ride a unicorn to work, because looks like I know noone who would do the needful for me.
To be specific, these are the
unicorns people who can sign your verification certificate, according to the website. And this is the reason ↓ why no one will sign it (unless, of course they are your parents/parents-in-law, or looking to retire in jail). [This innocent looking terminology ‘incorrect verification’, apparently, has layers of meaning in the Indian red-tapeism.]
As the protocol states it, the said document needs to be printed on the official letter-head of the person issuing it for you. Most of the people will entertain the request till this point. However, the catch lies in the second bit, which is: the document has to be accompanied with a photocopy of the person’s official identity card (grocery card in case of defense-officials), which is when the ‘F’ bit in the nomenclature of the annexure will come into play, and you will be asked to f***-off.
I reckon that the idea behind it is, that someone worth their weight in gold in the Indian bureaucratic system should vouch for me. Understandably so, for, what if while ambling around in the streets of Switzerland, I suddenly get tempted to rob a bank? Or say, while flying to Europe with Cathay Pacific, suppose I hijack the aircraft to my own back-yard? What if my so called ’emergency’ is a quick meeting with Al-qaeda chief, at his underground base?
Here is what is likely to happen when you step out looking for someone who can issue the certificate for you (not applicable in case your parents/parents-in-law hold any of the aforementioned positions):
Would I sign the documents had I the authority to do so?
No. Nor do I think that anyone in their right mind would and should, because the stakes are high.
Then what am I wanting to say through this article?
That, what good is a rule that services a mere handful of the people of a nation that has 1.3 billion population? Emergencies do not crop-up (the reason why ‘tatkal’ scheme was started in the first place) after assessing the bureaucratic elitism of a human being. This definitely needs fine-tuning and a practical approach.
Traveller-tip: Apply for appointment only after you have your documents ready.